Jarrah White has taken exception to the identification of Venus in two of the Apollo 14 photos. Using amateurish, procedurally sloppy methods, he attempts to prove that the photos are inconsistent. Jarrah’s video: www.youtube.com And he’s wrong again.
Analysis of claims made by Moon hoax conspiracy theorists regarding alleged multiple shadows and multiple light sources, presented on example of image AS17-136-20744.
This is how easy it is to Debunk moon hoax claims, a family entertainment show can do it! why can they do it when they are not scientists, because the ppl who came up with the whole hoax, they are not scientists either! I just hope that all cts have carried on their research and can now debunk the LRO images of the landing sights! Please leave your Debunking of this Debunking! How did nasa build a Low G set in a vaccum, of at least a half mile square? What are the LRO (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) images of the Apollo 11 landing sites of? lunar.gsfc.nasa.gov
This is how easy it is to Debunk moon hoax claims, a family entertainment show can do it! why can they do it when they are not scientists, because the ppl who came up with the whole hoax, they are not scientists either! I just hope that all cts have carried on their research and can now debunk the LRO images of the landing sights, from 2006, i hope nasa and the scientific community have been keeping in touch with all ct’s unless they are still rehashing the shame old always already debunked hoax claims.
Bminternet43’s concentrated collection of Apollo fallacies required more than one video in response. Here is part 2 of what will be three (maybe four!) parts. Relevant links below. bminternet 43’s video “Faked”: www.youtube.com Philwebb59’s great “crater” videos. (Sorry, Phil, I forgot to include these at first): “Does Having no Blast Craters Discredit…” www.youtube.com and… “Pseudonomics” 3 parts: www.youtube.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com Clavius Moon Base: www.clavius.org NASA Lunar Excavation Course Chapter 7: Thermal Considerations of Lunar Based Systems by Daniel K. Harris education.ksc.nasa.gov
These rover traverse films are among the better proofs that we really went to the moon. It takes a real stretch of the imagination to suppose they were faked when all the factors are considered. Moontrue’s rover footage: www.youtube.com www.youtube.com Ytmoog’s rover footage with audio: www.youtube.com
The gist: If you think the moon landings were faked, tell me what you think NASA should do to prove it’s really there when it goes in 2018. Make a Video about it or just leave a message in the comments section below (Jarrah, I’m looking forward a video on this subject if you got the time).
Founder Lewis A. Beach responds to the spurious accusations made by conspiracy theorists regarding the authenticity of the moon landings. In this two-part video, a wide variety of hoax accusations are discussed, including flag movement, radiation exposure, impact craters, photographic anomalies, among other ‘factual inconsistencies’ brought forward by moon hoaxers. — This video is presented by Science of Reason, a nonprofit educational society devoted to the promotion of scientific …
Here’s the second half of my response to Willywill84’s criticism of the Apollo program. Not only is he a self-declared, uncredentialed expert on this and 9-11 and the Kennedy assassination, but he is apparently a biblical scholar as well. Go figure! His video: www.youtube.com
People so uniquely ignorant of the most basic facts really shouldn’t be going around pretending they are experts and presuming to wake everybody else up to the “truths” they’ve discovered on a couple of Internet conspiracy sites or moronic YouTube videos. Here’s the link to Willywill84’s expert opinions on the Apollo program. www.youtube.com